Australia’s environment is ‘poor and deteriorating’ says damning new report – صحيفة الصوت

But despite the grim toll global temperature rises are having on Australia’s landscape, Plibersek said the new Labor government would not renege on its pre-election promise to allow new coal mines, if they won environmental approval and commercial support.

Nor would the government be raising Australia’s targets of cutting emissions by 43% on 2005 levels by 2030, or achieving net zero emissions before its stated target of 2050.

“There are some people who would say we shouldn’t have any mining anywhere. It’s just not a sustainable or reasonable proposition for a modern economy like Australia’s to say that,” she said.

“We made a promise on zero net emissions with an interim target of 43% carbon pollution reduction. We will keep that promise.”

The report noted that Australia’s emissions are likely to have peaked. But climate scientists say they are not declining fast enough to meet the Paris Agreement to limit the global average temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius. According to researchers at Climate Analytics, Labor’s 43% target is consistent with 2 degrees Celsius of global warming.

How bad is the environmental degradation?

The report found that Australia has lost more mammal species than any other country in the 38 member Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (a grouping that includes the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and New Zealand); that there are now more foreign species than native ones; and the country has experienced “a plague of marine plastics,” Plibersek said in a speech to the National Press Club following the report’s release.

In the country’s northern waters, lost or abandoned fishing nets are strangling up to 14,000 turtles a year, and down the eastern coast, warming seas have killed kelp beds, threatening reef habitats and abalone and lobster stocks, she added.

On land, more than 77,000 square kilometers (30,000 square miles) of habitat belonging to threatened species have been cleared in the past two decades — an area roughly the size of Tasmania or Ireland. “Much of this clearing occurred in small increments,” Plibersek said. “In fact, more than 90% of it was never assessed under our environmental laws.”

The clearing has impacted Australia’s koalas, which are now endangered in three states and territories.

Since the last State of the Environment report was released in 2016, there’s been an 8% increase in species listed as threatened under the country’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act (EPBC).

The most recent report said the number of endangered species could be even higher due to inadequacies in the risk assessment process, and so too could the number of extinctions.

“Most mammal extinctions in Australia have been driven by predation from introduced species, especially the feral cat and European red fox,” it added.

What’s the government doing about it?

The Labor government laid the blame for Australia’s environmental degradation squarely at the feet of the Liberal-National coalition, who were in power from 2013 until losing the May election.

“The previous government’s funding cuts held back business, they damaged the economy, and they undermined practical efforts to protect our environment,” Plibersek said during a televised press conference at the national press club in Canberra. She said so little effort had gone into achieving some targets that they would be almost impossible to reach.

Former environment minister Sussan Ley, now deputy leader of the Opposition, accused Plibersek of using the report as a prop for attacks on the government, pointing out that the Morrison administration spent billions of dollars on green initiatives.

Plibersek announced a number of new targets on Tuesday, but deferred others — including a “once-in-a-generation” reform of Australia’s environment and biodiversity laws (the EPBC) — until she had time to consult more widely.

The Labor government also plans to “expand the country’s national estate” by setting a goal of protecting 30% of Australia’s land and 30% of its oceans by 2030, and exploring the creation of new national parks and marine protected areas, Plibersek said. That includes “pursuing” the East Antarctic Marine Park, a proposal backed by Australia, France and the European Union to protect a vast tranche of the Ross Sea.

“We are so lucky to be so rich in First Nations cultural heritage, of course we need to have better systems for protecting it that don’t lead to appalling, shameful outcomes, like Juukan Gorge,” Plibersek said.

The report also highlighted the need to give Australia’s First Nations people more control over the protection and rehabilitation of the land. To that end, the government has also promised to double the number of Indigenous rangers to 3,800 by the end of the decade.

Nicki Hutley, an economist with the Climate Council, said changes to Australia’s environment laws must oblige the government to consider the impacts of climate change when considering applications for new coal and gas projects.

Kelly O’Shanassy, Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Conservation Foundation, said independent oversight was also needed to ensure government targets are met.

“To halt Australia’s nature crisis we need strong national environment laws, an independent regulator to enforce them and adequate funding for the recovery of Australia’s threatened species and the restoration of degraded landscapes.”